|
||
| |
|
It is relatively easy to reduce the environmental impact of maintenance activities at hydro power plants by a series of measures relating to the lubricants being used, says Ken Brown THERE IS a growing need to take into account the environmental impact of hydro power plant operation. In the past, this has focussed mainly on the physical structures of the dam and how it might fit into the environment and the impact on water flows and fish kills. However, maintenance activities of equipment can also have considerable environmental impact as can ‘accidents’ causing oils spills and even normal operational activities can carry a risk if lower impact materials are not used. For example, the commonly used mineral oil based lubricating oil and transformer fluids can have a significant impact if spilt on the water or even on the ground. These can require considerable clean-up costs and can involve significant loss of good will. In an effort to reduce the risk of damage to the environment and contamination of water, some hydro plant owners have turned to environmentally friendly greases, oils and hydraulic fluids, as well as modifying their O&M activities to minimise risk to the environment. Making lubricant choices that are good for the environment does not have to mean compromising the reliability of equipment or functionality. In fact, correct environmental decisions should be a part of a good cost-effective design. The design aspects can include the equipment itself, maintainability, economic life span, ergonomics, operation and lastly, eventual removal. The latter does not necessarily mean land fill, because depending on the specifics, there may still be some recoverable worth. For example, it does not make sense to change oil in equipment unless it is really at the end of its useful life. Unfortunately, this is usually not the case, because the oil is often changed solely on an arbitrary time criteria or because of contaminants such as water or dirt. These contaminants can usually be easily removed with the right equipment. This is also not overly expensive but the proper equipment has to obtained. For example, a good oil filter cart that can be used for oil cleaning and topping up might cost US$1500-2000. This should have wheels for ease of transport, a beta rated filter element, a filter condition indicator, pin type sample valves, automatic housing air bleeds, good hoses, quick disconnects, a screw type pump (to prevent emulsifying water), and a good quality finish. Not only does using oil for longer periods mean that less liquid waste is produced, but there will also be cost savings because labour can be used more effectively elsewhere, new oil will not have to be purchased, and equipment does not have to be shut down for an oil change. These added costs can amount to at least five times the price of the oil on its own. However, to be fully effective, a number of correct decisions must be made throughout the life of the product. Initial selection Furthermore, with the right choice, there is a greater likelihood that a product can later be used elsewhere in less demanding applications. The correct choice might be synthetic lubricants, it might be different additives, and in other cases it could be biodegradable products and/or products with less environmental impact. A decision matrix has been proposed for a European Community environmental evaluation. However, while the best choices for each application can vary according to the specific circumstances, all the choices must work satisfactorily in the equipment that needs to be lubricated. For example, some synthetic lubricants might not be compatible with the materials; in other cases, good separability from water might be required or good solubility might be needed. Typical fluid characteristics are shown in Table 2. • Whether or not the base materials are from renewable resources. • How much energy is used and/or waste produced during • Are they safe to use? • Will they work? • Do they biodegrade and what are the end products? • Are they easy to maintain? • Is the service life better? • How is waste handled? • What is the ecotoxicity? Fortunately, doing something better can be very easy, whether it is by making better use of a current product or picking a new one. However, for the latter, it is very important to address all the issues. For example, food grade lubricants are not necessarily better environmentally and the ones that are white for cosmetic reasons often contain a significant level of zinc compounds. These can actually be more detrimental. Equipment design Reducing liquid waste An important aspect of extending the lubrication service life is condition monitoring. This serves three main purposes. First, to ensure that the right lubricant is in place, because when starting to do such checks, it is often found that oil of the wrong viscosity has been used. Such tests can also determine if the right oil is being used. For example, a hydroelectric turbine oil will destroy the required ability to separate out water. Similarly, in some cases, extreme pressure additives may be necessary while in others, such as rolling element bearings, they can actually reduce fatigue life or reduce the maximum operating temperatures of plastic cages. Secondly, it is important to know how the oil-lubricated equipment is. A major advantage of oil testing is that you can detect problems in the oil before it shows up in the equipment. Other methods have to wait until there is damage. This is very important, as the goal is not to save the oil, which is usually very inexpensive, but to prevent consequential damage to bearings and/or gears. Even the cheapest shaft bearing will require an outage for replacement. Lastly, by testing the oil, it can be determined what is required to keep it in good condition. This can be filtration, purification, sweetening, or, with large systems, re-inhibition with additives. The advantage is that if you do not have to change it, uptime is maximised and waste oil generation is minimised. However, even when there is contamination, it is usually an advantage if the lubricant can be treated while it is still in the equipment so that an outage is not required. The treatment process is simpler if the lubricant is not mixed with other products or inadvertently contaminated. Portable equipment is available that can usually be taken right up to the oil to be treated. Taking action Equipment Design Selection of Material Maintenance Condition monitoring In-situ treatment If using a contractor, it is important to ensure that they have treated this particular fluid successfully before. It is also prudent to ensure that there will not be any cross-contamination. For example, any equipment should have been well flushed before use with the same fluid. Re-use or disposal Training Due diligence Summary
|
Buyer's Guide
Site Search
Site and archive search
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
International Water Power and Dam Construction ©2010 Published by Global Trade Media, a trading division of Progressive Media Group Ltd. Terms & Conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|