ROT work in Macedonia

28 October 2010



Hydropol has been working on a rehabilitate-operate-transfer (ROT) project which covers seven hydropower plants in Macedonia. Tomáš Cerný gives an insight into the work which has been undertaken


A rehabilitate-operate-transfer (ROT) project covering seven hydropower plants was awarded to Hydropol Project & Management AS through its Macedonian subsidiary MacHydro Project Co AD in 2002. The project includes construction of one new power plant, complete rehabilitation of six power plants, and 11 years of operation of the project with total installed power exceeding 38MW. The project includes the following small hydropower plants of medium and high head located across Macedonia: Dosnica, Kalimanci, Matka (new power plant), Pena, Pesocani, Sapuncica, and Zrnovci. The core works (construction works) on this project were completed this year.

Before refurbishment

Most of the power plants in the ROT scheme were built in the first half of the 20th century. The only exception is the HPP Kalimanci which was commissioned in 1970 together with the Kalimanci earthfill dam. The majority of the plants were operated without any major modernisation or general refurbishment since commissioning.

Major repairs were performed only at Pena hydro plant (built in 1926) due to severe flooding in 1984. This repair included tunnelling of a new derivation channel, outer penstock replacement, and replacement of a major part of the electromechanical equipment.

After years of operation without major repairs, most of the electro-mechanical equipment was far behind its exploitation period. State of repair included heavily damaged turbine parts due to erosion, cavitation and fatigue, heavy leaking of valves, significant oil leaks throughout the equipment, low generator winding insulation resistance etc.

The state of the power plants before the refurbishment can be illustrated by a few examples. Some of the equipment was not capable of proper operation and of performing their safety functions – none of the overflow detectors were functioning, most of the penstock valves were not capable of automatic or remote closing. Even simple automation was not installed on most of the power plants, eg the level control of the units was based on a water chamber level reading and communication over the radio between personnel. Before Hydropol oversaw the rehabilitation of the plants, Zrnovci‘s average production of 5.2MkWh barely covered operational costs involving 20 employees.

Scope of the works

Generally, before refurbishment the power plants suffered from low efficiency, large maintenance requirements and an enormous number of employees were involved in the operation. Therefore, general refurbishment and modernisation of the power plants became inevitable. The key goals of the ROT project were as follows:

• Increase the turbine efficiency to state-of-the-art parameters.

• Uprate the utilisable discharge.

• Full automation of the operation.

• Remote control and monitoring of the operation.

The scope of works for the seven power plants was very wide. It started with construction of the new HPP Matka (next to the original HPP Matka) using the existing dam and modified water inlet tunnel; through to rehabilitation of Pena and Pesocani accompanied with medium scale civil works connected with the complete replacement of the units or turbines; ending with the reconstruction of Kalimanci, Sapuncica, Dosnica and Zrnovci, representing a typical technological refurbishment with a small amount of civil works of auxiliary character.

Although the scale of works was different at each site, the scope of rehabilitation of the electro-mechanical equipment was in general the same for all power plants involved in the project. The list below contains the typical scope of rehabilitation:

• New or general overhaul of the turbine, including new runner, guide vanes/nozzles, repair of bearings, new hydraulic actuation, new or repaired shafts, new instrumentation.

• New or general overhaul of the generator, including new magnetic circuit and electric circuit of the stator, rewinding of the rotor, repair of mechanical parts, and new instrumentation, including unit speed metering sensors.

• New hydraulically actuated penstock, turbine, and bypass valves (butterfly, ball, needle valves).

• New high pressure hydraulic aggregate of the speed governor, common also for turbine inlet valve and its bypass.

• New lubrication and oil cooling system with focus on the minimisation of water pollution risk by oil.

• Piping works – new assembly joints and adjustment of the pipeline and penstock parts for the new equipment, installation of valves.

• New overhead travelling cranes in machine halls – electrically controlled.

• New automatic intake technology, including new steel gates and trashrack, new hydraulic controlled trashrack cleaning machine, sedimentation tank level control and flushing.

• New switchgears 6.3 and 35kV (cubicle or cell type components).

• Overhauled or new dry power transformers 6.3/35kV, new home consumption transformers 0.4/35kV of a dry type.

• New MV cabling and installation of the MV equipment.

• New control system of the units and auxiliary equipment, static excitation of overhauled generators, and SCADA system enabling remote control over the internet connection.

• New multifunctional generator protections and line protections.

• New small power installation of the powerhouse.

• Ultrasonic flow measurement in the penstock.

• New diesel gen-set for backup power supply and black start of the units.

• Civil works linked with the new equipment – eg cableways, inlet pipeline channel modifications, modification of the switchgear, new openings for transport of the equipment, etc.

Hydropol played the role of a turnkey supplier of the works, keeping the key features of each particular project in-house – the organisation and scheduling, basic design and tendering, in-production supervision, site management, and commissioning. Financing of the whole project was also secured by Hydropol.

Organisation of the works

As Hydropol also ensures the operation of the power plants, the key feature of the works on each site was the time schedule. This was selected to fit the needs of the complex rehabilitation and at the same time to minimise generation losses. Therefore, it was adjusted to each power plant‘s standard operation performance. For all the sites, the refurbishment was accompanied by shut-down of the power station. This was usually scheduled for summer and fall. However, Kalimanci was overhauled during the fall and spring period when there are no irrigation requirements and water is accumulated in the dam.

The rehabilitation of HPP Dosnica was performed in the period of a peak demand for raw materials and semi products with almost double standard delivery times compared with the time of the original scheduling. As most parts were replaced completely or new main turbine parts (runners, shafts, guide vanes/nozzles) were installed, the only really lengthy repair was the overhaul of the generators. Therefore, the schedule was modified to this situation and two generators were disassembled in the fall of 2007, rehabilitated, and assembled back with the present turbines to catch the 2008 spring water. When the water flow dropped in the beginning of summer, the third generator and turbine were disassembled and sent for overhauling. This schedule adjustment helped the economy of this particular rehabilitation as production losses were minimised.

For the shutdown during rehabilitation, the needs of the connected water consumer had to be considered. At Dosnica, the supply of fresh cold water to the nearby fish farm through the buried diversion channel could not be interrupted, even for one single day in the hot Balkan summer. Therefore, overnight disassembly of the turbine inlet pipeline had to be performed. A diversion pipeline from the penstock directly to the tailrace was installed.

Local irrigation in Zrnovci village had to be maintained during the shut-down. Based on an agreement with local farmers, a mobile pump was installed into the river bed and water was pumped back to the tailrace channel.

Performance evaluation

In the preparatory phase of the rehabilitation, detailed performance measurements were performed in order to assess the technical condition of the equipment and establish real design parameters for the refurbishment. From these measurements, unit efficiency measurements prior to refurbishment can be pointed out. This measurement not only gives efficiency data for future comparison, but also important information about the whole pressure water system and gives the necessary background data for design parameters of the new equipment.

HPP Sapuncica is a good example of such measurements. Its operational performance indicated significant pressure losses in the penstock. Among production losses due to lower head, decrease of the turbine hydraulic efficiency could be expected as the turbines worked out of the design head range. After thorough investigation, enormous incrustation inside the steel penstock was discovered.

This goethite blister-like incrustation of peak ca 20mm in height was caused by the reaction of the steel pipe with highly oxygen-saturated water. The incrustation was removed by a loosely inserted abrasive cleaning tool being pushed down the penstock by water. After the cleaning, a 2% increase in turbine efficiency was measured as well as a penstock loss decrease of about 33%.

A full scale site acceptance test was performed after the commissioning of the refurbished power plants. The measurements included turbine efficiency (either with flow measurement by pressure-time method and generator efficiency confirmed by calorimetric methods, or direct thermodynamic method measurement of turbine efficiency), governor and automatic processes, unit noise level, unit vibrations, generator electrical test, and island operation tests.

Successful completion

As described above, the so-called core works on the project have been finished successfully and all the power plants are operating smoothly in fully automatic mode as expected.

Throughout the remaining period of the ROT project, auxiliary works must be completed. These include the bottom outlet gate exchange at the Matka dam which will allow automatic releasing of the biological minimum during emergency shutdown of the units. The corrosion protection of steel penstocks will also be completely renewed or repaired on all power plants, all intakes will be automated, and small civil repairs of the structures will be finished.

Tomáš Cerný, Project Manager, Hydropol Project & Management AS. Email: [email protected]



Description of sites

HPP Dosnica is located on the Dosnica River near to the town of Demir Kapija. The water supply scheme consists of a weir with an alpine type intake and sedimentation tank, a 10km long system of buried channels, tunnels, and steel siphons overcoming one of the valleys. From the water chamber, a 600m long steel penstock leads to the powerhouse, where 3x2.2MVA, 6.3kV generators are driven by Pelton single jet horizontal shaft turbines. The tailrace channel supplies fresh water to a nearby fish farm.
HPP Kalimanci is located on the Bregalnica River near to the town of Delcevo. It is part of the Bregalnica hydro system where Kalimanci earthfill dam is the main facility. This irrigation system provides water for 28,000ha in the Kocansko and Ovce Pole regions, so operation of the dam and power plant complies mainly with irrigation needs. HPP Kalimanci is thus the only power plant not operated mainly in run-of-river mode. The plant has 2x6.8MW vertical Francis turbines and is the largest power plant of the ROT project.
HPP Matka is located on the River Treska 14km away from the Macedonian capital, Skopje. It was constructed in 1938 and has been in regular operation since then. The dam is a reinforced concrete arch type 38m in height. There are three units in the powerhouse of Old Matka (the original power plant) with Francis turbines with a total discharge 19.5m3/sec. In 2005 HPP Kozjak was commissioned on the upstream dam. With its large storage capacity and maximum discharge of 80m3/sec, it is used as a peak load power plant. Such peaks could not be utilised by the Old HPP Matka and thus large discharge uprating of the site was necessary.
HPP Pena is located on the River Pena near to the town of Tetovo. The plant is a derivation type plant with a weir side intake facility, a 1km derivation tunnel, water chamber, and a 120m long steel penstock. There are two unevenly sized (1.3 and 2.0MW) horizontal units with Francis turbines installed in the powerhouse.
HPP Pesocani is located on the River Pesocani near the town of Ohrid. A 4.9km long derivation channel collects water from the main intake and two smaller side intakes to an open water reservoir. Then, a 950m long steel penstock leads to the powerhouse, where two synchronous 2.2MVA generators are driven by four single Pelton jet turbines (two turbines per generator on each side).
HPP Sapuncica is located on the River Sapuncica near to the town of Bitola. It is a derivation type plant with a small dam and side intake facility, a few smaller side intakes, a 4.9km long buried derivation channel, water chamber, and a 1.85km long steel penstock. There are 2x1.6MW horizontal units installed in the powerhouse with Pelton single jet turbines. The tailrace channel supplies water directly to the main municipality drinking water treatment reservoir of Bitola.
HPP Zrnovci is located on the Zrnovka River near to the town of Kocani. It is a derivation type plant with a weir and side intake facility. There are 2x0.85MW units with single Pelton jet turbines installed in the powerhouse. A 3.4km long water supply tunnel is used in the summer months as a water storage reservoir. This enables operation of the turbine in optimal flow range in the morning and evening hours, when the tailrace channel feeds water to the local irrigation system.



Tables

Table 1

Pesocani - Machine hall after refurbishment Pesocani - Machine hall after refurbishment
Kalimanci Kalimanci
Sapuncica - Penstock incrustation Sapuncica - Penstock incrustation
Matka Matka
Pena - Spiral cases ready for installation Pena - Spiral cases ready for installation
Matka - Construction site in 2004 Matka - Construction site in 2004
Zrnovci Zrnovci
Pesocani Pesocani
Pesocani - Turbine runner buckets Pesocani - Turbine runner buckets


Privacy Policy
We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.